We increasingly expect our environments to be smarter, to understand our queries and contexts and, perhaps, even our intentions.
The problem with personalization is that you really have to define what you're trying to personalize and in what context. It's important to create user scenarios -- or try to define, in some detail, the user experience. In order to do that, you have to get very precise about what it is the person is looking for and what kinds of information that person needs to have. Then, you have to ask the second question: Once users achieve one task, how do we continue to keep them engaged?
You need to avoid a failure of design. For example, once I've bought a TV, the last thing I want to know is about all of the other TVs I didn't buy. But maybe there's something about the viewing experience that the company could tell me -- tips on how to use the TV or how to find related services.
The issue with personalization is that you have to decide if you're personalizing at one point in time or throughout a continuous flow of interactions, and then determine how much the company knows about the user or the user segment. Then there's always a question of privacy and the right to be forgotten. I think personalization is one data point in a much larger conversation.
WCM software must give way to multichannel content management
Could search engine technology change the Web?
Dig Deeper on Enterprise Web content management software
Related Q&A from Geoffrey Bock
Programs such as Box Shield use machine learning to better secure content, as it monitors existing content continually to learn about new ... Continue Reading
Content services platforms are the evolution of enterprise content management systems. Here's what you should know about each technology and how they... Continue Reading
While business process management and workflow work together, they have two very different functions. Learn how they can fit into your business model. Continue Reading